In a dramatic political move that has ignited national debate, UK Labour MP Rosie Duffield has resigned from her role as a government whip over proposed cuts to disability benefits—calling the policy a betrayal of the most vulnerable.
Duffield’s resignation shines a spotlight on growing tensions within UK politics as the government considers tightening eligibility and reducing support under the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) and other disability-related schemes.
“I cannot support policies that disproportionately target disabled people already facing hardship,” Duffield said in her resignation statement.
The move has triggered widespread backlash from disability advocacy groups, with many warning that the proposed benefit changes will:
- Increase poverty among disabled people
- Limit access to essential care and support
- Worsen health and mental well-being outcomes
This comes amid growing concern in the UK over rising living costs, NHS backlogs, and the lasting effects of austerity on disabled communities.
Rights organisations across the country are calling on Parliament to halt any reforms that would undermine the independence and dignity of disabled citizens, and to engage directly with those affected.
Duffield’s resignation is being seen not only as a stand for disability rights but also as a broader call for ethical governance in social care policymaking. As public pressure mounts, the question remains: Will political leaders listen to those they represent—or continue to balance budgets at the expense of the most marginalised?
